Central Sydney Region High Rise Strategy

Background

In 2004 the (then) Department of
Housing commissioned the study “Managing
our High Rise Buildings – A Framework for managing our high rise buildings in
Central Sydney Division.
” The study was undertaken by a consultant and
documented the tenancy, building management and community engagement aspects of
managing high-rises. It sought to provide a strategic framework for managing
the 23 high rise buildings that the Department manages.

Study findings

The study concluded that:

  • High rise housing is a viable form of social
    housing in Sydney, particularly in well located and well serviced areas,
    provided it is appropriately managed and well maintained.
  • High rise housing has an important place in the
    Division’s portfolio now and into the future, in an environment of increasing
    demand from smaller and single person low income households.
  • The approach to management of buildings in a high
    rise context must be fully integrated. 
    This will require coordinated strategies and synchronised action across
    the core responsibilities of the Division: viz, tenant selection, tenancy
    management, community building and asset management.
  • It should be ensured that tenants are suited to
    high rise living. Any necessary support services must be put securely in place
    before the commencement of the tenancy or as needs change.
  • To increase the access of different client groups,
    alternative tenancy and service delivery models should be introduced
  • Tenancy management must be responsive to the particular
    demographic, social and physical circumstances of each building and its
    surrounding community.
  • Tenant involvement in management decisions for
    particular buildings enhances local “ownership” of the facility and builds
    community participation and support.
  • On site staff presence has proved beneficial in
    overseas and interstate situations and should be strongly considered.
  • In the case of large high rise complexes, a
    management approach, used increasingly in the private sector, is highly recommended.
  • A positive long term approach to community building in partnership with
    residents and service providers should be developed

The Strategy proposed that individual Management
Plans for each of the high rise buildings be prepared, outlining an integrated
approach to asset management, tenancy,
building management and community engagement strategies for each building.

Response to the High Rise Strategy report

Subsequently, CSR staff undertook work
to develop draft pilot plans for 3 groups of high rise buildings:

  • The 3 high rise buildings at
    Poet’s Corner
  • Matavai and Turanga in Waterloo
  • Marton and Slander

In developing these plans, staff
undertook some consultation with residents in those high rise buildings and
local organisations serving social housing residents and communities.

A corporate decision was then taken
that the development of management plans for every building was not the best
use of limited staff resources and that the recommendations of the High Rise
Strategy report could be implemented in more effective ways. It was decided
that high rise buildings could continue to be managed as part of a business as
usual approach, using the tools already available, such as Local Allocation
Strategies, the Human Services Accord and community development projects like
HCP. Opportunities to implement the recommendations of the strategy would be
identified as they arose.

Subsequent Actions

Subsequently, the Federal Government’s
Nation Building Stimulus funding became available in 2008 and provided an
opportunity to put significant investment in the upgrading of core services
within high rise buildings in Redfern and Waterloo. Over $ XXXm has been spent
over the last 3 years in upgrading lifts, sewerage systems, repairing concrete
and painting.  

The High Rise Strategy report also
made an important contribution to HNSW’s Long Term Asset Plan (LTAP) developed
in 2008.

In addition, following the
recommendations of the High Rise Strategy report, and representations from a
number of sectors, work was done on a possible ‘concierge’ model for some high
rise buildings. The Waterloo Green Neighbourhood Project was subsequently developed
as a pilot project to significantly improve management and security in the 6
Waterloo high rise buildings. This will result in the investment of $12m over 3
years in an innovative pilot project. In announcing the project, the Premier
and local Member, Kristina Keneally said that if the project proved to be
successful it would be rolled out in other high rise buildings.

Consultation findings

The consultations that were carried
out to develop the draft pilot management plans for the 3 groups of buildings,
covering 7 high rise buildings in Redfern and Waterloo, during 2007 informed
the development of subsequent initiatives.

A summary of the consultations
findings for the 3 groups of buildings is set out in the Appendix.    

1. Matavai and
Turanga

Key
issues raised by tenants

  • Tenants raised the issue of improper
    allocations and how some residents are not suited to high rise living.
  • There is a lack of understanding of what is
    expected of the tenants and the roles and responsibilities. This
    highlights the need for proper induction and ongoing engagement / contact
    with DoH staff.
  • The tenants also raised the issue of residents
    with poor living skills and their inability to keep the units and common
    areas clean.
  • Alternative use of common rooms and better
    utilisation of the ground floor common areas for recreational activities
    was requested.
  • The need for a range of organised social and
    recreational activities was also raised.
  • Safety and security issues and general
    maintenance are the main recurrent issues cited by the tenants.

The issues
were prioritised as  

  • Safety & security
  • Housing elderly with elderly
  • Adaptability & Amenity of
    bathrooms/kitchens
  • Reducing social isolation
  • Increasing social and recreation activities

 

2. Marton and
Solander

 

Building Maintenance

 

  • Lack of Lighting in the hallway and other
    common areas.
  • Unreliable lift facilities
  • Efficiency in responding to maintenance
    required to be improved
  • Open access to Laundries enables non
    residents to enter &, occupy,
  • Perception of concerns related to poor
    timeliness of Housing Contact Centre services
  • Tenants on higher floors are disturbed by
    the noise from water pumps
  • Carpets in common area are difficult to
    maintain
  • Windows are not cleaned externally/

Common Area Cleaning

  • Management of pets 
  • More effective Graffiti cleaning methods are
    needed
  • Cleanliness in security car park area
  • Improved management of rubbish rooms and
    garbage bays required
  • Cleanliness of carpets in common areas

Safety

 

  • Perceived personal safety in common areas
    and in the immediate vicinity of buildings particularly at night
  • Security for personal belongings
  • Security in the security car park
  • Security in lifts, common areas, entrance
    and the immediate vicinity of buildings
  • Compatibility of tenants with high-rise
    living
  • Tenants knowledge of their duties and
    obligations as tenants, neighbours and citizens
  • Presence of Graffiti generates a feeling of
    a threatening environment
  • Attentiveness of security guards
  • Improved response times to tenant requesting
    from the Police assistance is required

Information and

Service

  • The
    practice of accessing the Housing Contact Centre by tenants via the Team
  • Tenants access to information on roles and
    responsibilities towards making their immediate environment is safe,
    clean, and comfortable 
  • Access to information for tenants on
    high-rise living and basic information needed to live in the inner city
  • Cleanliness,
    maintenance, disability access and equipments in Community Rooms
  • Opening
    hours and frequency of Outreach office

Community Cohesion

  • Social
    events for tenant interaction
  • A
    tenant mix that is conducive to better harmony among tenants
  • Lack of
    organised activities for tenants
  • Limited
    opportunity to nurture neighbourly relations
  • More
    services catering for CALD groups 
    is needed
  • Garden
    seats are old, broken, pain peeled off, and not maintained and located
    at uneven surfaces.

Relationship with Team

  • Follow
    up action in response to issues raised by tenants 
  • High
    staff turnover inhibit the development of relationships between
    respective tenants and CSOs

3. Poets
Corner

Tenancy Issues

Residents
Kit

  • No residents kit for new tenants
  • Rubbish removal – do new tenants have
    key? 
  • Contact details for new tenants
  • Follow up household members

Pets

  • Pets – lack of care / noisy
  • Pets – large dogs living in units

Recycling

  • Recycling – should be floor by floor

Graffiti

  • Graffiti
  • Vandalism is reported to team but slow
    response time

Illegal
occupants

  • Short term conditional leases
  • Illegal tenants

DoH related

  • Complaints aren’t followed up
  • Not enough DOH presence
  • Managerial presence at meetings
  • Team service provider liaison

Allocation

  • Tenant screening / selection
  • Allocations of new tenants

 

Building Maintenance

Lights

  • Security should advise if lights are out

Foyers

  • Phones used in foyers MCC
  • Front doors vandalised
  • Carpet damage in foyer
  • Roof leaking onto foyer carpet
  • Rubbish left in foyer

Balconies

  • Balconies need to be upgraded
  • Plumbing leaks, over balconies

Car parking

  • Car parking

Fire Stairs

  • Fire stairs – graffiti
  • Fire doors broken – used for anti-social
    behaviour
  • Slow response to fire door repair (12 months)

Bathrooms

  • Air vents in bathrooms

Inspections

  • Inspections don’t happen
  • Spot checks – no notice

Lifts

  • Lifts functioning, but dirty / buttons burned
    out
  • Lifts break down
  • Cameras in lifts
  • Complete overhaul / replacement of lifts

Laundry
Room

  • No lock on laundry room – items stolen

Security
Screens

  • Security screens scratched on

Pests

  • Rats in concrete holes
  • Pigeons

Open space/
Grounds

  • Noxious / allergy weeds in gardens

Cleaning

  • Cleaning to be improved

Intercoms

  • Good – intercom is working

Laundry/
Bin

  • Replacement of keys for laundry / bin

Roof/
Ceilings

  • Roof upgrades – pitched zincalume clad roofs
  • Sealing between floors to prevent water from
    sprinklers leaking downstairs

Walls

  • Painting of external building wall
  • Painting of internal walls / removal of
    graffiti
  • Painting of garbage and laundry rooms
  • Breakdown of membrane and cracked sealant on
    external building surface, due to building Movement allowing water
    penetration to internal unit walls

Feedback on
Maintenance

  • Feedback on preventative maintenance programme
    following property assessment survey by Hi-Tech Inspect  – nova 2005

Community Building

 

 

Community
activities

  • Community activities – build on making it a
    community to live in

New tenants

  • New tenants – no interest in being responsible
    for part of the community

Things I
like about living here

  • Good – Doctor
  • Some good neighbours
  • Good access to shops and transport

Community
Centre

  • Need community centre like Northcott

Tenant Reps

  • More defined roles of tenant rep

Regular
contact with elderly

  • Regular home phone contact for elderly living
    alone (Redfern inner city home support service or Blue cross tele-call
    service)

Tenant
consultation

  • Tenants need communication/ feedback and the
    opportunity to comment on projects before final decisions are made that
    impact on all the community of the estate.

Safety and Security

CCTV

  • Monitoring of CCTV not happening
  • Need more CCTV

 Vandalism

  • Front doors vandalised

Fire doors

  • Fire doors left open / alarms removed during
    fire upgrade, not replaced

Youth
issues

  • Younger tenants causing problems

Graffiti

  • Anti-graffiti paint

Nuisance
& Annoyance

  • Nuisance and Annoyance yelling over balcony

Security
guards

  • Security guards not doing jobs
  • 24 hour monitored emergency service (e.g.
    Vital Call (a subsidiary of Chubb)
  • Security cameras installed in GFLR mail room,
    entrance lobby and inside lifts – vandalism etc responded to rapidly
  • Need better security
  • Security guards not doing jobs

Police
patrols

  • More local police patrols / drive around /
    exercising stop and search

Common
grounds

  • Misuse of common grounds

Theft

  • Clothes stolen from dryer

Drug Use

  • Drug use in common areas

Unauthorised
entrants

  • Unauthorised entrants waiting at doors to
    enter
  • Building open at the rear

Source: This document has been supplied to REDWatch by HNSW on 31 January 2011