Background
In 2004 the (then) Department of
Housing commissioned the study “Managing
our High Rise Buildings – A Framework for managing our high rise buildings in
Central Sydney Division.” The study was undertaken by a consultant and
documented the tenancy, building management and community engagement aspects of
managing high-rises. It sought to provide a strategic framework for managing
the 23 high rise buildings that the Department manages.
Study findings
The study concluded that:
- High rise housing is a viable form of social
housing in Sydney, particularly in well located and well serviced areas,
provided it is appropriately managed and well maintained. - High rise housing has an important place in the
Division’s portfolio now and into the future, in an environment of increasing
demand from smaller and single person low income households. - The approach to management of buildings in a high
rise context must be fully integrated.
This will require coordinated strategies and synchronised action across
the core responsibilities of the Division: viz, tenant selection, tenancy
management, community building and asset management. - It should be ensured that tenants are suited to
high rise living. Any necessary support services must be put securely in place
before the commencement of the tenancy or as needs change. - To increase the access of different client groups,
alternative tenancy and service delivery models should be introduced - Tenancy management must be responsive to the particular
demographic, social and physical circumstances of each building and its
surrounding community. - Tenant involvement in management decisions for
particular buildings enhances local “ownership” of the facility and builds
community participation and support. - On site staff presence has proved beneficial in
overseas and interstate situations and should be strongly considered. - In the case of large high rise complexes, a
management approach, used increasingly in the private sector, is highly recommended. - A positive long term approach to community building in partnership with
residents and service providers should be developed
The Strategy proposed that individual Management
Plans for each of the high rise buildings be prepared, outlining an integrated
approach to asset management, tenancy,
building management and community engagement strategies for each building.
Response to the High Rise Strategy report
Subsequently, CSR staff undertook work
to develop draft pilot plans for 3 groups of high rise buildings:
- The 3 high rise buildings at
Poet’s Corner - Matavai and Turanga in Waterloo
- Marton and Slander
In developing these plans, staff
undertook some consultation with residents in those high rise buildings and
local organisations serving social housing residents and communities.
A corporate decision was then taken
that the development of management plans for every building was not the best
use of limited staff resources and that the recommendations of the High Rise
Strategy report could be implemented in more effective ways. It was decided
that high rise buildings could continue to be managed as part of a business as
usual approach, using the tools already available, such as Local Allocation
Strategies, the Human Services Accord and community development projects like
HCP. Opportunities to implement the recommendations of the strategy would be
identified as they arose.
Subsequent Actions
Subsequently, the Federal Government’s
Nation Building Stimulus funding became available in 2008 and provided an
opportunity to put significant investment in the upgrading of core services
within high rise buildings in Redfern and Waterloo. Over $ XXXm has been spent
over the last 3 years in upgrading lifts, sewerage systems, repairing concrete
and painting.
The High Rise Strategy report also
made an important contribution to HNSW’s Long Term Asset Plan (LTAP) developed
in 2008.
In addition, following the
recommendations of the High Rise Strategy report, and representations from a
number of sectors, work was done on a possible ‘concierge’ model for some high
rise buildings. The Waterloo Green Neighbourhood Project was subsequently developed
as a pilot project to significantly improve management and security in the 6
Waterloo high rise buildings. This will result in the investment of $12m over 3
years in an innovative pilot project. In announcing the project, the Premier
and local Member, Kristina Keneally said that if the project proved to be
successful it would be rolled out in other high rise buildings.
Consultation findings
The consultations that were carried
out to develop the draft pilot management plans for the 3 groups of buildings,
covering 7 high rise buildings in Redfern and Waterloo, during 2007 informed
the development of subsequent initiatives.
A summary of the consultations
findings for the 3 groups of buildings is set out in the Appendix.
1. Matavai and
Turanga
Key
issues raised by tenants
- Tenants raised the issue of improper
allocations and how some residents are not suited to high rise living. - There is a lack of understanding of what is
expected of the tenants and the roles and responsibilities. This
highlights the need for proper induction and ongoing engagement / contact
with DoH staff. - The tenants also raised the issue of residents
with poor living skills and their inability to keep the units and common
areas clean. - Alternative use of common rooms and better
utilisation of the ground floor common areas for recreational activities
was requested. - The need for a range of organised social and
recreational activities was also raised. - Safety and security issues and general
maintenance are the main recurrent issues cited by the tenants.
The issues
were prioritised as
- Safety & security
- Housing elderly with elderly
- Adaptability & Amenity of
bathrooms/kitchens - Reducing social isolation
- Increasing social and recreation activities
2. Marton and
Solander
|
Building Maintenance
|
|
|
Common Area Cleaning |
|
|
Safety
|
|
|
Information and Service |
|
|
Community Cohesion |
|
|
Relationship with Team |
|
3. Poets
Corner
Tenancy Issues
Residents
Kit
- No residents kit for new tenants
- Rubbish removal – do new tenants have
key? - Contact details for new tenants
- Follow up household members
Pets
- Pets – lack of care / noisy
- Pets – large dogs living in units
Recycling
- Recycling – should be floor by floor
Graffiti
- Graffiti
- Vandalism is reported to team but slow
response time
Illegal
occupants
- Short term conditional leases
- Illegal tenants
DoH related
- Complaints aren’t followed up
- Not enough DOH presence
- Managerial presence at meetings
- Team service provider liaison
Allocation
- Tenant screening / selection
- Allocations of new tenants
Building Maintenance
Lights
- Security should advise if lights are out
Foyers
- Phones used in foyers MCC
- Front doors vandalised
- Carpet damage in foyer
- Roof leaking onto foyer carpet
- Rubbish left in foyer
Balconies
- Balconies need to be upgraded
- Plumbing leaks, over balconies
Car parking
- Car parking
Fire Stairs
- Fire stairs – graffiti
- Fire doors broken – used for anti-social
behaviour - Slow response to fire door repair (12 months)
Bathrooms
- Air vents in bathrooms
Inspections
- Inspections don’t happen
- Spot checks – no notice
Lifts
- Lifts functioning, but dirty / buttons burned
out - Lifts break down
- Cameras in lifts
- Complete overhaul / replacement of lifts
Laundry
Room
- No lock on laundry room – items stolen
Security
Screens
- Security screens scratched on
Pests
- Rats in concrete holes
- Pigeons
Open space/
Grounds
- Noxious / allergy weeds in gardens
Cleaning
- Cleaning to be improved
Intercoms
- Good – intercom is working
Laundry/
Bin
- Replacement of keys for laundry / bin
Roof/
Ceilings
- Roof upgrades – pitched zincalume clad roofs
- Sealing between floors to prevent water from
sprinklers leaking downstairs
Walls
- Painting of external building wall
- Painting of internal walls / removal of
graffiti - Painting of garbage and laundry rooms
- Breakdown of membrane and cracked sealant on
external building surface, due to building Movement allowing water
penetration to internal unit walls
Feedback on
Maintenance
- Feedback on preventative maintenance programme
following property assessment survey by Hi-Tech Inspect – nova 2005
Community Building
Community
activities
- Community activities – build on making it a
community to live in
New tenants
- New tenants – no interest in being responsible
for part of the community
Things I
like about living here
- Good – Doctor
- Some good neighbours
- Good access to shops and transport
Community
Centre
- Need community centre like Northcott
Tenant Reps
- More defined roles of tenant rep
Regular
contact with elderly
- Regular home phone contact for elderly living
alone (Redfern inner city home support service or Blue cross tele-call
service)
Tenant
consultation
- Tenants need communication/ feedback and the
opportunity to comment on projects before final decisions are made that
impact on all the community of the estate.
Safety and Security
CCTV
- Monitoring of CCTV not happening
- Need more CCTV
Vandalism
- Front doors vandalised
Fire doors
- Fire doors left open / alarms removed during
fire upgrade, not replaced
Youth
issues
- Younger tenants causing problems
Graffiti
- Anti-graffiti paint
Nuisance
& Annoyance
- Nuisance and Annoyance yelling over balcony
Security
guards
- Security guards not doing jobs
- 24 hour monitored emergency service (e.g.
Vital Call (a subsidiary of Chubb) - Security cameras installed in GFLR mail room,
entrance lobby and inside lifts – vandalism etc responded to rapidly - Need better security
- Security guards not doing jobs
Police
patrols
- More local police patrols / drive around /
exercising stop and search
Common
grounds
- Misuse of common grounds
Theft
- Clothes stolen from dryer
Drug Use
- Drug use in common areas
Unauthorised
entrants
- Unauthorised entrants waiting at doors to
enter - Building open at the rear
Source: This document has been supplied to REDWatch by HNSW on 31 January 2011