The images, which drew horrified gasps from Chippendale
residents and business owners, show a 110-metre high apartment block, directly
opposite and only four metres shorter than the detested brown tower of the University of Technology,
Sydney.
The proposed skyscraper is about 36 storeys and appears to
be surrounded by two apartment and office blocks of about 75 metres, other
towers of about 50 metres and a series of smaller buildings that dramatically
alter the gateway to the city and extend the CBD skyline southwards.
The site’s owner, Foster’s, has refused to release the
images for publication in the Herald, or to the residents who attended
Tuesday’s meeting because “they would be wrong”.
It says the images, which show the maximum height allowed
under flight path restrictions, were prepared to “demonstrate the different
kinds of concepts that are being developed”.
“There’s a lot of work to be done in terms of
finalising how the final development will look,” a spokesman for Foster’s,
Geoff Donohue, told the Herald.
The public meeting was called by the expert panel advising
the Planning Minister, Frank Sartor,
who took over planning control of the $1 billion development in June.
The panel’s chairman, a former government architect, Chris
Johnson, who works for Mr Sartor, was accused of running a “token meeting”
that was misleading and insulting because he could not provide details of
Foster’s plans.
He was questioned about the potential density of the
development because locals are convinced Foster’s will be allowed a much higher
density than the City of Sydney Council was prepared to accept when it was
negotiating with the company.
A scoping paper submitted by Foster’s shows that it wants to
develop 260,000 square metres of floor space, including 1800 apartments.
Professor Johnson said the panel had not concluded what the
density should be, although it had asked Foster’s to prepare the images that
showed the maximum building height.
“We thought it was best to start with the maximum
[height] and work back,” he told the meeting.
“It [the tallest tower] wouldn’t be as ugly [as the UTS
tower]. It would be hard for us to do that … the question is whether this
eyesore is helped by some neighbourly support.”
A spokeswoman for the Chippendale community, Jeanette
Brokman, said the images showed a mini-Manhattan overshadowing a heritage
village.
“That makes you think you are going to get Greenwich Village. This is more about mini-Manhattan on
steroids. This is the ugly side of New
York,” she said.
Locals also questioned the planning process, under which
Professor Johnson will submit his panel’s report to Mr Sartor by the end of
this month, before Foster’s lodges its plan for the 5.8-hectare site. It is
unclear if the panel’s advice will ever be made public, although the Foster’s
plans will go on public exhibition.
A City of Sydney
councillor, John McInerney, said the process ignored two years of work by the
council and the Central Sydney Planning Committee.
“We
are now being presented with what Foster’s really wants, what they need to make
enough profit for themselves,” Cr McInerney said.
The Printed Herald article had an artistist impression of the CUB proposal. A photo of one of the slides shown to the public meeting which also shows one of the maximum height possibilites can be seen at CUB
Site
The Planning NSW site contains the Scoping Paper prepared for Fosters which sets out what they want from the site.