Introduction and
Context
While the current exhibition is about the North Eveleigh portion of
Redfern North Eveleigh, this site is an integral part of both the wider Redfern
Station and North Eveleigh precinct that will be assessed as a single site
under the State Significant Precinct (SSP) requirements issued in December
2020.
In addition, North Eveleigh forms a part of the former Eveleigh Railway
Workshops and in terms of heritage interpretation should be seem in the broader
heritage context within the context of the proposed Eveleigh Railway Workshops
Conservation Management Plan. Much heritage work has been done as part of the
South Eveleigh redevelopment and it is important that the North Eveleigh Vision
builds on and compliments what has been done at South Eveleigh.
Historically these two sides of the railway line were connected by
pedestrian links. A vision for North Eveleigh must recognize and respond to
this wider context. Currently the Vision is only for a stand-alone site, primarily
focused on its proximity to Redfern station.
The site also sits within the new transport related movement desire line
from the Waterloo Metro site to Sydney University, as well as the existing movement
desire lines from Alexandria and Waterloo to Darlington and Newtown.
This has implications for non-station use of the Southern Concourse at
Redfern Station and underlines the importance and potential for reinstating other
cross railway line connections between North and South Eveleigh. Technology
uses at both South and North Eveleigh would also benefit from agglomeration serviced
by easy access across the railway line, as well as to Sydney University and
surrounding business locations.
REDWatch notes that the SSP requirements include “a Movement and Access Plan setting out the proposed
movement corridors, access and connectivity network throughout the precinct
(and beyond), the types of movements to be captured through the precinct (i.e.
walking, cycling, vehicles, machinery, employees etc. during a 24-hour period)”.
Correctly,
this requires TfNSW to look also at movements and connectivity beyond the SSP precinct
and to put the site in its wider context. REDWatch supports this SSP
requirement and makes its submission in the context of the wider area.
The North Eveleigh site also sits each side of Carriageworks and is
adjacent to the Darlington Heritage Conservation area. It needs to both interact
with and compliment both Carriageworks and its surrounding conservation area with
primarily residential uses.
To the east of the site is the connection to southern and eastern buses
that will service North Eveleigh. From the days of the Premier’s Department
Redfern Waterloo Partnership Project in the early 2000s, tackling the barriers
created by the twin arterial roads and the railway corridor was seen as the key
to developing a well-connected precinct.
The Vision cannot ignore the southern and eastern bus connections to
this site. As Transport for NSW and the Transport Cluster oversees roads, buses
and rail it provides a unique opportunity to end the standoffs between previously
separate agencies. With everyone around the same table it should be possible to
deliver a well thought-out bus rail interchange which integrates with the road
system and delivers a well-connected bus-rail interchange service for North
Eveleigh.
While one of the Vision
principles is “Connected people and places”, the Vision statement is weak on
connectivity other than to Redfern Station. Even to Redfern station, it is only
to “Investigate a direct pedestrian connection between the Precinct and
Redfern Station”.
Previous studies have recognised that the site is land-locked and
constrained in how it connects to the surrounding areas. Good connectivity will
be the key to success for this project, both for the community benefit will
provide and for the activity and access it can create for the site.
Vision needs to include
North Eveleigh to South Eveleigh connectivity
Previous planning for North Eveleigh identified the need to connect
north and south Eveleigh by re-instating connections across the railway
corridor. When rail workshops were operational, there were three ways to cross
the railway line. The Redfern Waterloo Authority (RWA) explored options for
connections near Carriageworks and later towards Redfern Station. UrbanGrowth
proposed linking the southern part of the site to Macdonaldtown station and
potentially from there towards Alexandria and Erskineville.
Of this connectivity, “The Redfern North Eveleigh Strategic Vision” says
“Investigate a direct pedestrian
connection between the Precinct and Redfern Station and the feasibility of a
pedestrian crossing over the railway corridor”. However, the opportunities
and challenges diagrams (Fig 69 & 60) only show east-west movement
opportunities and doesn’t include north-south movements. Overcoming the railway
corridor barrier would create substantial movement through the site and
associated retail opportunities for the development.
A north-south
connection would also provide a significant community benefit by linking
Alexandria and Waterloo to Darlington and Newtown. This would put a much larger
number of residential properties in close proximity to North Eveleigh and
increase the likelihood that people who work on the site will consider living
locally rather than weighing up transit times between living in the inner west and
walking around the railway corridor barrier.
TfNSW should undertake,
as part of its Movement and Access Plan assessment, the impact of the railway
barrier. Based on a quick Google maps analysis, if a bridge was placed near the
Large Erecting Shop and landed near Carriageworks, the trip across the bridge
would replace what is currently a 19-20 minute walk for the same journey. Such
a bridge would make Alexandria around 10-15 minutes closer to the Carriageworks
section of North Eveleigh even after the new Southern Concourse.
There is an issue with
an overhead connection that needs to be addressed and this is the length
required to provide a disability gradient to clear the railway lines. The
initial RWA proposal at Carriageworks proposed a lift at each end. The proposal
in its concept plan used the space around the ramping as public open space.
REDWatch understands
that the Mirvac / Google / Sydney Uni unsolicited proposal for North Eveleigh
addressed this problem by having the walkway connection from within a building
on the North Eveleigh site. This option should also be explored early in
planning for the site.
REDWatch notes that
UrbanGrowth placed an easement on the South Eveleigh sale to allow a
cross-corridor connection to land on the South Eveleigh site. Our discussions
with various people in Mirvac and South Eveleigh indicate that a cross-corridor
connection would be supported by Mirvac.
Given the lack of open
space in North Eveleigh and Darlington, it was suggested at a recent REDWatch
meeting that a green platform approach / highline across the rail corridor might
provide some local amenity as well as a pedestrian cycle bridge. Such options
should be considered as a signature move for the site.
We note that the Vision
does propose to look at possibilities for connections under the railway line
and this may be viable, but we note that the current tunnel does not go all the
way across the corridor and new underground connections are constrained by the
location of the dives. Because of the movement barrier created by the
Locomotive Workshop, consideration needs to be given to how pedestrians would
access the tunnel and how CEPTD principles would be applied to ensure safety and
surveillance in a long underground tunnel.
There is no mention in
the Vision of UrbanGrowth’s proposal for the Newtown end of the site to connect
to Macdonaldtown station or beyond. Iverys Lane and through Pines Estate is shown
as the connection to Macdonaldtown Station. Direct connection to Macdonaldtown station
from North Eveleigh should be considered given government’s focus on transit-focused
development. Such a connection could address disability access to Macdonaldtown
station and provide an improved alternative for rail travellers from the inner
west to the western North Eveleigh precinct and to Sydney University and RPA.
Creating connections
across the railway corridor for walking and cycling was Key Move 3 proposed by
UrbanGrowth.
Vision needs to address
connectivity around Redfern Station
As mentioned in our
overview, the problematic movements to and from buses to the east, and to and
from the Waterloo Metro, are brushed over in the Vision by saying “A bus
interchange area is located immediately east of the station, providing services
to a range of locations across Sydney. The new Waterloo Metro Station, due to
open in 2024, is located within a 15-minute walk from the Precinct”.
By its glossary, TfNSW refers
to an interchange as having an “adjoining bus stop”. This definition certainly
does not cover the distance from the new Southern Concourse to south-bound
buses across two arterial roads with an uphill walk to pedestrian crossings.
This bus stop is not “immediately east” nor adjoining. The Vision report says
the nearest arterial road to the site is “the Princes Highway, approximately
230 metres to the north” and makes no reference to the Gibbons / Regent
arterial pair to the East that impedes bus connection to North Eveleigh.
Currently even with buses
that terminate at Redfern Station and then do a return southbound route, they
are not allowed to pick up South bound passengers on Gibbons Street. All southbound
passengers must cross the arterial twin pair to move from the station to the
east of Regent Street. Depending on the let off point, it is doubtful that
there is a disability acceptable gradient between buses and the station
entrance in Redfern. The Southern Concourse will exacerbate this problem and
create a new commuter desire line across Gibbons and Regent Streets in line
with Marion Street.
REDWatch has suggested
in its background paper on connectivity (attached) that a bus interchange
should be explored in conjunction with the Southern Concourse and ESR over
station development. It may be possible to provide an all-weather interchange
under the ESR development or by “lifting” Marian Park and placing an
interchange under it. In the absence of looping southbound buses or an
interchange solution that brings Southbound buses closer to the station, there
will be a need either to consider a pedestrian bridge across Gibbons and Regent
Streets or to place new pedestrian crossings across these roads in line with
Marian Street.
These options require further work by the rail, road and buses
components of TfNSW to deliver an integrated solution servicing North Eveleigh.
REDWatch understands
that TfNSW is considering having more buses terminate at Redfern rather than
Central and this will add to the number of commuters who will make bus-rail
interchanges at Redfern.
It needs to be also
understood that north-south bus routes will connect two rail lines (Airport and
Metro) to the rest of the rail network running through Redfern. Many bus users
will likely remain on buses to make these connections through Redfern rather
than changing modes to go via Central or another connecting station.
The current opportunities and challenges diagrams in the Vision stop at
Redfern Station with no indication of how they operate past there. A Vision for
increasing development into North Eveleigh must show how those attending will safely
connect to buses as well as trains. This includes all-weather connections to
buses on Gibbons Street, solutions to re-route southbound buses through Gibbons
Street, or safe and sheltered ways to move to southbound buses in Regent
Street.
Connectivity around Redfern Station was a key part of Urbangrowth’s
proposed Key Move 1 to renew Redfern Station.
Vision needs bike
connectivity
Much is made of bike paths and of the use of walking and riding in the Vision
but this focused on Wilson Street. The Opportunities and Challenges (Fig 60)
shows the Wilson Street shared cycle way and an on road shared cycle way route
within the North Eveleigh site. It also shows the bike path in South Eveleigh
to which these cycle paths do not connect.
It is important to understand that the Wilson / Little Eveleigh / Lawson
Street cycle way does not connect with the South Eveleigh Cycle way along
Gibbons Street. Currently those who want to make this connection often ride on the
Gibbons Street footpath through the pedestrian holding area for the Lawson /
Redfern Street lights and the bus to rail desire line and road signage.
It is likely that with the opening of the Southern Concourse that many
riders will wish to make the north-south connection via that Concourse. This is
one of the reasons why REDWatch wants a 24-hours ungated Southern Concourse.
We urge TfNSW in the bike aspect of the Movement and Access Plan study,
to make sure bike movements along Gibbons Street and north-south bike movements
are properly assessed. Proper bike connectivity needs to be provided for those
wishing to ride to and from the North Eveleigh site.
Vision needs a barrier
free no ticketed Redfern Station Southern Concourse
While the Southern Concourse is under construction, we understand its ongoing
operation has not yet been finalised and that its operation may change over
time.
REDWatch expects that there will be heavy non-train access use of the
Southern Concourse. Until a more central crossing point is built, the Southern
Concourse will be the main link between Waterloo Metro and Sydney University,
and between Darlington / North Eveleigh and South Eveleigh retail.
We note the Vision talks about the precinct being designed to be part of
the 24-hour economy and yet currently closure of the concourse is considered
when trains are not running. There is a strong business and community view that
the concourse, because of the connectivity it provides across the railway line,
needs to be open continually.
The nearest supermarket and potentially restaurants for some people in
Darlington will now be at South Eveleigh. More student housing along Regent and
Gibbons Streets also increase the number of pedestrians who will use the
Southern Concourse as a connection rather than a way to access the rail system.
Given all this non-rail pedestrian traffic, the Concourse should operate,
as far as practical, as a public thoroughfare. To allow wheelchairs, bikes,
prams, trolleys and other hand held items easy access across the rail corridor
the Southern Concourse should not be gated.
To facilitate movement, REDWatch would prefer tap on and tap off to be
located, as it is at most other stations, at the platform level or at the top
of stairs rather than at each end of the Southern Concourse.
It should be possible for people to move across the railway line without
fear of penalty. No one should be fined $200 for crossing the Southern
Concourse if they have not used the rail system. Ideally, sniffer dogs, and
other activities that impair free movement, should also not be allowed to
operate on the Southern Concourse.
At a minimum, a protocol should be put in place guaranteeing that Opal cards
will not be requested or checked on the Southern Concourse.
Vehicle Access to the
East of the North Eveleigh needs to be resolved
Even if the development was to be relatively car free, prolonged heavy
vehicle access will be required for construction. There will also be an ongoing
vehicle access requirement when the site is developed and for delivery vehicles
after construction is completed. The resultant road structure will be a key
factor in determining the final design for the site.
The current proposal (Fig 60) has only vehicular access from the Newtown
end of the site and lists the Redfern end as “private service access point to the
site” (Fig 59). The proposed Vision’s proposal
to open up “access to the eastern half of the Precinct by extending
Carriageworks Way as a key connecting access spine”.
This approach places vehicular
traffic through the Carriageworks precinct in the middle of the site. The use
of this part of the site for a road connection will have a major impact on this
primarily pedestrian area and it will split Carriageworks use from the adjacent
Blacksmith Shop for a road. Carriageworks use this space as an extension of the
main building and the Blacksmith Shop for activities like Eveleigh Markets and
some cultural activities.
As for earlier plans for North Eveleigh TfNSW needs to determine an
eastern access point to the site.
TfNSW has pre-empted some of this discussion by its decision to place
the entrance of the Southern Concourse into Little Eveleigh Street and creating
a share zone for station users to enter and exit the station. This makes it
very difficult to use Little Eveleigh Street as the North Eveleigh access
point.
As requested by the community, a site wide movement analysis should have
been undertaken prior to the Southern Concourse decision.
Lack of Plans to
integrate North Eveleigh to South Eveleigh
The TfNSW strategic
vision currently doesn’t seek to integrate with South Eveleigh either in terms
of immediate connectivity or in leveraging movements from Waterloo Metro and
Alexandria to Sydney University and RPA Hospital.
It also doesn’t look at
how to integrate with the high tech tenants at South Eveleigh and how that
might improve agglomeration and incubation.
Further, while the
North Eveleigh Vision document uses many heritage photos from the Southern side
of the former Eveleigh Railway Workshops, there is no indication it is interested
in signing up to an integrated heritage interpretation which compliments what
is happening at South Eveleigh.
While Mirvac, which runs
South Eveleigh, is a developer that has previously lodged an unsolicited
proposal for North Eveleigh, this should not be used as a reason for not
exploring how North Eveleigh can integrate best integrate with its historical
twin at South Eveleigh.
Aboriginal Affordable Housing
The Redfern Waterloo Aboriginal Affordable Housing Campaign has called for 10%
Aboriginal Affordable housing on the development of all government owned land
in Redfern Eveleigh Darlington and Waterloo. REDWatch supports that call for
10% affordable housing in North Eveleigh as a way of maintaining an active
broad Aboriginal demographic in Redfern.
While the Vision report
acknowledges the community asked for “dedicated Aboriginal housing and tenancies”
the Vision on for all affordable housing is to “deliver at least 5%-10%
affordable housing”. On the Waterloo South site, the City of Sydney is
proposing 20% be affordable housing. A higher affordable housing component is
needed to sit alongside the business incubation and start-ups and creative arts
where people are often on low income. A higher target is also necessary where the
project needs to also deliver dedicated Aboriginal affordable housing.
The Vision statement
has a lot to say about involving the Aboriginal community in the development
especially around the Government Architects’ “Designing with Country” and
“Cultural Design Principles”. Given the significance of the area to the
Aboriginal community, one of the key ways to respond to Country is surely to
ensure that Aboriginal people continue to live in this area of such great
significance to them. Aboriginal affordable housing has to be at the centre of
this.
It should also be
acknowledged that “Designing with Country” in Redfern-Waterloo is likely to be
linked to the areas importance for the development of Aboriginal Organisations
and Services. There is a rich Aboriginal contemporary history to draw on for
interpreting country and ensuring the community in the area not only survives but
also thrives.
Delivering a diversity
of housing choice and tenure was ‘Key Move 10’ for UrbanGrowth.
Adaptive
Reuse of Heritage Buildings
The Vision talks about a requirement for the
adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. The Burra Charter principles should
however be applied. Different heritage buildings require different approaches
so this cannot be a one size fits all exercise. For example, the Chief
Mechanical Engineers Building should not have its exterior impacted by its
reuse. The location of this building and
the work already taken on the exterior lends itself to early delivery of
activation of this State Significant building.
REDWatch is concerned about the mention about
activating the long blank façade of industrial buildings with possible new
openings. Presumably this refers to Carriageworks. The bay structure of Carriageworks
lends itself to activation uses without damaging the heritage facades of
buildings. Maintaining theses facades and their grandeur as much as possible
should be a part of the Vision. Obviously, any activations of the Carriageworks
building would need to be consistent with Carriageworks plans for the site.
In North Eveleigh, REDWatch is looking for a
South Eveleigh Locomotive Workshop heritage outcome rather than a token Harold
Park Tram shed one. In the South Eveleigh Locomotive Workshop adaption, there was
a strong heritage interpretation plan involving both tangible and intangible
heritage. There were definite heritage benefits derived from the development
both for the site itself, but also for heritage as an ongoing asset of the
site.
Heritage
is more than the old buildings
One of the problem on the North Eveleigh side
is that there is little other than the buildings to tell the heritage stories.
Much work needs to be done to bring the people and processes stories to life on
the North Eveleigh site. This also applies to Carriageworks as well as the
TfNSW portions to be developed.
UrbanGrowth previously produced Eveleigh
Stories but as Urbangrowth managed the Australian Technology Park it focused on
South Eveleigh. South Eveleigh holds a large machinery collection and an active
heritage blacksmith. There is no need for North Eveleigh to replicate this.
The challenge for North Eveleigh is to build
upon the South Eveleigh heritage work so the story of the former railway
workshops is told across the entire site. The redevelopment of the Locomotive
Workshops forced Mirvac to look closely at heritage interpretation and how it
told the Eveleigh heritage stories. North Eveleigh can build on and compliment
the work done at South Eveleigh.
Ideally a single Eveleigh heritage walk app and
approaches to sharing heritage information, signage and wayfaring could allow
the North Eveleigh development to become part of something wider than just its own
development.
Before UrbanGrowth was disbanded, it was
working with the Heritage Office on a site wide
Conservation Management Plan that aimed to ensure that both sides of the
former Eveleigh Railway Workshops were interpreted as part of a whole site.
Resurrecting this proposal and engagement with ex-workers and heritage
practitioners familiar with this site will be crucial if the community is to
end up with the heritage benefit possible from this site and not just some
adaptively reused buildings.
REDWatch has been very active in pushing for
the best possible heritage outcomes in the redevelopment of the former
railyards and we will continue to push for an integrated heritage result
through the North Eveleigh planning and development.
Opportunities exist for innovative heritage
interpretation to tell the stories of people and processes on the North
Eveleigh site. The North Eveleigh Blacksmith shop has some original hammers and
Carriageworks has pulley shafts and other remnants that can be creatively used
to compliment South Eveleigh and tell the stories from the northern side.
Opportunities exist for heritage displays and
interpretation of the former railyards. One item not yet provided across the
site is a heritage repository where items can be collected about the site from
ex- workers.
One sensitive heritage area will be how the
development deals with the fan of tracks, which is not a heritage building but
rather rail lines that take up a significant area. Might this be an area for a
park?
It is REDWatch’s view that resurrecting the
site wide Conservation Management Plan and looking at complementarity across
the two sites will be the key to a good heritage outcome.
TfNSW should take early briefings from Mirvac’s
heritage consultants to understand what has been done at South Eveleigh and how
it can be built upon at North Eveleigh and possibly at Redfern Station.
Great
Places for Community – The lack of Parks
Great places for community are needed for
success and it is concerning that the Vision has removed a park from the eastern
half of the site that was present in the earlier North Eveleigh Master Plan.
Darlington has only one small park, Charles
Keenan Reserve, which is loved to death with Council needing to periodically
close the park to let the grass grow and couple of tiny resumed terrace site
spaces. On the Newtown end where a park is proposed in the Vision, Hollis Park
is nearby.
Parks should not be traded off between ends of
the site and the concept needs to acknowledge the need for a park at the
Redfern station end of the redevelopment. Previously this park was located
around the pedestrian bridge that linked the eastern end of north and south
Eveleigh. As mentioned previously a green platform / high line above the rail
corridor may provide much needed green space as well as north-south
connectivity.
While great places can also include hard
surfaces and plazas, they are not a replacement for real grass. For real grass
to survive there needs to sufficient green space to accommodate the use promoted
by the density of the surrounding area.
Urban Growths ‘Key Move 2’ for the area was to
create a green network and a key park would be part of delivering this move.
Responding to what has gone before
Many people living in the area will have been
involved in earlier consultations about this site and they will be keen to
understand what has been picked up from previous plans and what has been
omitted and why.
While UrbanGrowth never delivered its
Affordable Housing Study or its Transport Study, it did recommend 10 Key Moves.
It is worthwhile looking back at those moves and to see how the TfNSW strategic
vision responded to them. In this submission we have related some of our comments
to the Key Moves proposed by UrbanGrowth that relate to North Eveleigh.
The Vision report seems to deal with the bits
it likes from the Central to Eveleigh Urban Transformation Strategy on the last
page of its analysis (page 54) but avoids others. UrbanGrowth’s Key Move 3 to
“create walking and cycling connections across the railway corridor” is
missing. Such a connection was a part of the RWA’s North Eveleigh Concept Plan.
Key Move 2 was to create a green network, but
in the current proposal is mentioned only in the context that Wilson Street is
part of broader green network identified by City of Sydney Council. The Vision
statement retains the large park towards Newtown, but only talks about pocket
parks being proposed in the Redfern Station end.
24 Hour
Economy
During the 2020 consultation on North Eveleigh,
the issue of the impact of some events at Carriageworks on surrounding
residents was raised as an issue. The current state government proposal to move
some areas, including in Eveleigh to a 24-hour and night-time economy needs to
be handled very carefully. The area that is subject to this Vision is
surrounded by residential areas with some mixed use. Ensuring resident amenity
while conducting a 24-hour economy on a thin strip of land will likely have its
challenges. These need to be considered early in the planning process.
Trading
Off Vision Principle
Like the 2020 North Eveleigh forum
presentations, the Vision is very high level. The challenge is really how the
principles and possibilities explored in the presentations and Vision will be
adapted to the local circumstances.
Like environmental considerations in
development there will have to be trade-offs like green rooves vs solar
collectors. These trade off will also come back to how prepared TfNSW, or the
developers they sell to, is prepared to invest in the long term of the site and
its Vision. This was identified as being one of the keys to success in one of
the opening presentations in 2020.
The Vision document as it stands tell us some
of what is possible, it does not relate the Vision to the site and assess its
feasibility nor does it relate the Vision to TfNSW’s imperatives for a financial
return or investment in the site. As a consequence TfNSW may be reluctant to provide
a cross corridor pedestrian and cycle connection as the cost to TfNSW and the
redevelopment is likely to trump what previous planners have said is a key need
for the site.
Much more work needs to be done to firm up how
these principles might be traded off against each other and against the
financial imperatives before we get a clear idea of what the actual principles
are likely to be for North Eveleigh.
When the Vision for North Eveleigh comes more
into focus we will be happy to comment more.
Conclusion
In this submission, we have covered some of the
main areas of concern to REDWatch. We have not commented upon many areas. This
is not because we lack interest or concern in these areas but because we are of
the view that the issues raised are the most important for the community.
REDWatch exists to try to ensure the community
gets a real say in what happens in such developments.
REDWatch also tries to ensure that the
community gains from the redevelopment of such sites and not just the
government or the developer.
From REDWatch’s perspective, improved
connectivity and amenity alongside a strong heritage outcome are key
deliverables that the community want to see from the North Eveleigh
redevelopment.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the
Redfern North Eveleigh Strategic Vision.
For
Further Information, contact:
Geoffrey
Turnbull
Co-Spokesperson
On behalf of REDWatch
Inc
c/-
PO Box 1567
Strawberry
Hills NSW 2012
Ph Wk: (02) 8004 1490
email:
mail@redwatch.org.au
web: www.redwatch.org.au
26
April 2021
Also
attached is the REDWatch Background paper for its Redfern Station Connectivity
Workshop on 22 April 2021 – REDWatch Redfern Station & North Eveleigh Connectivity